A judge, two judges seek ... The reports read the date of 20 April 2010, 12 clock, 12.15 clock, 13.30 clock summarized, on a date
Judge wonders: give AIDS a chance! Spiral use? A judge, two judges strive toward the hall, turn left, seated, flanked by the judge and the judge left the right the presiding judge Schulz, who whispers to his first recording device a few formalities. The three methods are discussed together, Heike Lemet and I are joined at the arms-sinner-Bank to our attorney digs against the opposing attorney, Dr. P. further reading for the chamber 25 of the Hamburg District Court show. Two submissions's are where it works "to the credibility of witnesses" have given (to quote Dr. S.), the affidavits. From the first appearances is striking: Some documents raise questions.
The judge and the judge in addition to Schulz practice is for minutes in the art of looking straight ahead, so they overlook the many witnesses in the courtroom, who have come from elsewhere in Germany. They should have their say, our lawyer requested.
beat the meantime, the waves a little high. For provides the opposing attorney, pointing out in the first nine months must be prevented at the facility, as long as the risk of infection can not be excluded. This makes the presiding judge suspicious. Because the issue is forced by preventing spiral. Those who are remembered Schulz, surely not protect against AIDS and other diseases.
The opposing lawyer, who has previously been pointed out that there are in the therapeutic community Wilsche break no penalties for so-called misbehavior is more to lose, a little up the thread. Then he makes the motion that the interim orders made on, as our lawyer to the hearing of the application Witnesses announced.
is so far not. At the request of the opposing attorney endure default judgments. In the meantime by Heike Lemet and I made bias claims against the judge and the two judges go down the legal stream. The witnesses are not able to speak.
After almost two hours time we sit together in a restaurant, an ARD-editor who has observed the trial, uses the opportunity to first personal conversations. The briefs we will look at us now exactly ... The ARD-editor as well.
Interim Results: In the subsequently filed pleadings against Stachowske Tjaden examined the head of the Therapeutic Community Wilsche breaking his salvation in speculation, half truths and lies. Example: Last year Ruthard Stachowske against two jurors summonses has obtained. It was about his personal insults on the net. Starting from these insults and the penalty, Stachowske now has a connection line is drawn to my reports. Here's how: The head of the Therapeutic Community Wilsche break claims against the district court of Hamburg, the two critics were my main sources of information.
This is ridiculous, Mr. Stachowske! Even more ridiculous is the allegation that I would make my blog deliberately provocative, to blog about advertising in this as much money. Note: I've done so many interviews with former desperate and angry that I'd be happy to know when I for the time that I spend a little compensation would get. What happens now and then. Sometimes I even get food packages ...
Further Report
