Bilatteral Cortical Cysts

Legal backfired

Rrrrummmsss!

May 2009: The Youth Services Lüneburg and Ruthard Stachowske threaten me with court action. Stachowske wants to pursue his interests "vehemently".

will not complain.

November 2009: The Youth Services Ruthard Stachowske Lüneburg and leave me a cease and desist letter to come because of an allegation that I have never set up.

then nothing more happens. Portals that have not been published for a time my reports, publish, them again.

February 2010: The attorney for the Youth Services Lüneburg sought an order against me means. The court deals with the request not to this day.
February 2011: Court does not consider the request valid, Stachowske asked for further explanations within 14 days
Read it once, what is the honorary professor to me since this all
accused 4th March 2011: The opposing lawyer withdraws his application

May 2010: The Youth Services Ruthard Stachowske Lüneburg and leave me a cease and desist letter to come because of an allegation that is still controversial.

December 2010 : Hamburg District Court does not understand theory

Rrrrummms!

Who actually paid the legal fees?

Rrrrummmsss!

claimed Despite these duds, counsel for the Youth Services Lüneburg, I was prosecuted for making false statements of fact ...

Heinz-Peter Tjaden

Legal standings

Tjaden 4

Stach. 0

Rrrummmsss!

Oh, well - really?

"We have taken legal action against the authors of the cyber-stalking and won all the procedures well before the relevant authorities. The courts have confirmed our legal position and the legality of our actions clearly and unambiguously."

Claims Ruthard Stachowske on the sides of the therapeutic community Wilsche break. Since 15 December 2010. He has repeatedly called this claim on 24 January 2011. Three days after a legal setback before the Hamburg court!

on a declaration of there has been no reaction. Now we apply for a temporary injunction.

9th February 2011
District Court of Munich has requested injunction

As the youth services Lüneburg to answer for according to the masthead the contribution of Ruthard Stachowske on cyber-stalking and clearly won legal proceedings, the new managing director, Gisela van der Heijden our Appellee. The application we presented at the Regional Court of Munich.

Decision of the District Court of Munich

Best Quality Catadioptric

court dates

Photo: Tjaden

Landgericht Hamburg, Sievekingplatz 1

20th April, 12.15 clock, Ruthard Stachowske against Heinz-Peter Tjaden
opposition proceedings for injunction
had filed suit against Säunisurteil
report here
Update: have been challenge for bias
opposition filed
judge position to partiality motion made
bias application is rejected
With a final letter Stachowske lawyer would end the matter
immediate appeal against refusal of the application bias
appeal rejected
Oral hearing on 2 November, 11 clock
default judgment remains
My comments are contained in,
7th February 2011: We have PKH-related appealed

administrative proceedings
Ruthard Stachowske against Heinz-Peter Tjaden
Based on a insurance under oath an employee of the lawyer of Ruthard Stachowske
Still no decision
19th February 2011 court does not consider the request valid, seeks further clarification
4th March 2011, the opposing attorney withdrew his request!

first October, 11 clock
conciliation and first used to date, action against youth services Lüneburg Tjaden
be postponed. Opposing counsel's allegedly ill ... New date: 19 November 2010, 10.45 clock
district court granted Hamburg legal aid (military value 35 000 Euro)
opposing counsel sought further Postponement. New date: 10 December, 11.15 clock
date postponed again: 21 January 2011
Hamburg Regional Court: butter fish, otherwise the application is rejected
delivery of a decision: 25 March 2011, 9.55 clock, room B335
Stachowske opinion

Written Pre-Trial, Ruthard Stachowske against Tjaden
Hearing , 2 November 2010, 11:30 clock, room must be obtained
The court partially granted legal aid (military value 24 000 Euro)
decision will be announced on 26. November, 12 clock, in room B316 decision announcement now on 3 December 2010 announcement of the court shall order until 10 December 2010, 12 clock, over!

decision of the district court of Hamburg on 10 December 2010: Heinz-Peter Tjaden must continue not a decision of this court with critical notes in all other action points fail Ruthard Stachowske.. The amount in dispute is set to 20 000 €. 5000 € to be covered by legal aid. with a quarter of the resulting costs Ruthard Stachowske, three quarters of Heinz-Peter Tjaden.
given a report with comments

We Appeals have inserted.

Thus, surfs the wave of the therapeutic community legal Wilsche break to the courthouse .

background info

Psycho expert

Rapporteur

5th May 2010

What actually is an original?

The available trial before the Hamburg District Court, the attorney of Ruthard Stachowske two further written statements submitted. Which were handed to the judge and our lawyer. One of the submissions contained a copy of a handover protocol. The original was the attorney of Stachowske present. Heike Lemet played at once, to have signed this protocol ever.

So they called after the negotiations insight into the original. For this purpose, it proposed a meeting in which Stachowske attorney would have the original in their book. To this request, the lawyer responded by sending another copy of this transfer protocol. For this he calculated eleven euro.

Stomach Cramps Urinating A Lot

now comes the spring?

The sun is shining! Although it is still a bit cold, but on the other hand one can attract so good. So have maja and I have a little push around the block. wonderful! Now we are very happy about the spring ...