29th August 2010
Stachowske makes old stuff currently
The Wolfsburg Erin on 28 August 2010 was an appeal by the youth welfare Lüneburg delivered. This time it's about the claim that the federal Justice Department had the Therapeutic Community Wilsche break put to the test. I would have spread such nonsense - will of Stachowske not sued? The Federal Ministry of Justice check - so Stachowske prosecutor on another occasion - legal action.
Because of the unfortunate history, I've turned several times to the Ministry. Brigitte R. replied on 10 June 2010 (Ref. IA 2 -3473 / 6 - 5 II - 12510 / 2010) that they assume that I do not spread this kind. In addition, is so was no longer to find the net. Final sentence: "Accordingly, there is at present no grounds to take legal steps."
That is German authorities, but nevertheless clear. Why can not rely on Stachowske things can be, for there is no other more interested? Thus, it still only one thing: The subject is topical again ...
21st May 2010
legal steps against innocent citizens?
The Federal Ministry of Justice is taking legal action against an innocent citizen from Wolfsburg and against innocent citizens from Wilhelmshaven. This monstrous Assertion is the attorney of Ruthard Stachowske, head of the Therapeutic Community Wilsche break out in a document to. Allegedly, the two falsely claim that the part of the ministry, the device has been put to the test.
covers the last few months, the head of the institution that supposedly makes a family-oriented drug therapy, portals and individuals with cease and desist, action and threats of lawsuits. Most of fizzled out.
Heinz-Peter Tjaden, editor of Wilhelmshaven, has spent a year in filings with the therapeutic community Wilsche break. The Wolfsburg Erin is doing likewise. In his research Tjaden be used again and again to the winner of the organization to authorities and other bodies. Usually, he got no answer.
In October 2009, turned the Wilhelmshaven editor established the Federal Ministry of Health. The reply by mail, the laboratory is the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs. From there, the matter moved to a further intervention to the Federal Ministry of Justice. Two notes were answered, which is of Tjaden still in a holding pattern.
Like everything in this matter, was the editor of the public. The citizen also from Wolfsburg. And now the attorney of Ruthard Stachowske claimed, so the federal Justice Ministry check legal action against the two. A give review of the therapeutic community Wilsche break it.
has now asked Heinz-Peter Tjaden, the Federal Ministry of Justice for an opinion. He wants to know: If applicable, what lawyer wrote this? Checks the Ministry really take legal action against two innocent citizens?
4th June 2010
mail to the Federal Ministry of Justice
Unit IA 2
Dear Mrs. R.,
thank you for your letter of 3 June 2010.
you as I once again point out that I am an editor for a year is spent by the therapeutic community Wilsche break. Then I received during my research on any side for an answer, turned I am finally to the Federal Ministry of Health.
I got from this Ministry in October 2009, the following mail: Dear Mr.
Tjaden,
thank you for your email.
The Federal Ministry of Health is particular to the provisions of the statutory health insurance (SGB V) and social insurance (SGB XI) and thus as responsible for the nursing homes. Your concern is primarily the responsibility of the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth. I ask you to turn to there.
This letter is on behalf of and with approval of the Federal Ministry for Health to the Communications Center was created and provided for your information.
Cindy J.
informed about this email I concerned. A concerned therefore appealed to the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs. From there, they finally got the message, is the responsible Federal Ministry of Justice. This ministry do accept notes. I've made it public. A person concerned from Wolfsburg did likewise.
I know that you, Mrs. R., two mothers have responded.
still interests me, whether the Federal Ministry of Justice wants to take action against me or not. They sidestep this issue in your letter. False assertions of fact I have not been prepared. If
The Federal Ministry of Family Affairs of the caller gave the wrong information over the phone and by mail, there is probably a need for clarification between the ministries.
is interesting for me that has Professor Dr. Ruthard Stachowske claims to be "precautionary" turned to the Federal Ministry of Justice. What he wrote to the Ministry, I would experience in a legal dispute with your ministry.
So please butter over the fish. Check legal action against me - or not? What would you support? The mother from Wolfsburg has received a letter from Stachowske lawyer - not me, even though the lawyer claimed that I would have dovetailed like "nonsense" like them.
This is the mesh of the Lord Stachowske: In an application, in cease and desist to a third party I am always the scapegoat. As the head of the Therapeutic Community Wilsche break it all has been said about me exceed on occasion my comprehension. What has he said to the authorities and courts for so many mothers and many children, also beyond my capacity.
I speak it not by hearsay, but on documents that I have received. I also know now many of the mothers and know something about children who are developing positively, as soon as they are no longer in the facility. This is now also a number of youth and many a court official noted. As examples, I call the family court in Lüneburg and the Family Court in Wolfsburg. A Wolfsburg Erin Judge is absolutely amazed about was that Mr. Stachowske makes dark hints about allegedly great dangers, but say concrete can not. The opinion of this judge I have received in writing.
12th June 2010
No legal action
The Federal Ministry of Justice shall initiate any legal action. This has, by letter dated 10th June 2010 the Division IA 2 from the 4th to my mail June 2010 responded. is continued in the letter: "The Ministry of Justice is general advice on legal, there are no observations in one specific case. This is not the role of the Federal Ministry of Justice and, incidentally, not the other federal ministries. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment